| Metric | Astro | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 54 | 45 | Astro |
| Accessibility | 92 | 89 | Astro |
| Best Practices | 91 | 87 | Astro |
| SEO | 94 | 92 | Astro |
| Security | 67 | 66 | Astro |
| TTFB | 321ms | 363ms | Astro |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | Astro |
Astro outperforms Open Graph in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Open Graph leads in no categories.
Choose Astro when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Open Graph doesn't clearly lead Astro in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 54 audited Astro sites and 3395 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback