Skip to content

Astro vs SolidJS

Based on 59 and 4 real audits

View Astro details | View SolidJS details
MetricAstroSolidJSWinner
Performance5554Astro
Accessibility9294SolidJS
Best Practices9199SolidJS
SEO9592Astro
Security6866Astro
TTFB304ms68msSolidJS
Composite7775Astro
Performance
Astro
55
SolidJS
54
Accessibility
Astro
92
SolidJS
94
Security
Astro
68
SolidJS
66
SEO
Astro
95
SolidJS
92
Composite
Astro
77
SolidJS
75

Astro outperforms SolidJS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). SolidJS leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Astro

Choose Astro when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose SolidJS

Choose SolidJS when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 59 audited Astro sites and 4 audited SolidJS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Astro or SolidJS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Astro sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (55 vs 54 on average).
Which has better security, Astro or SolidJS?
Astro sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Astro or SolidJS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor SolidJS (94 vs 92). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Astro or SolidJS?
Astro sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Astro or SolidJS?
SolidJS sites show lower Time to First Byte (68 ms vs 304 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Astro or SolidJS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Astro scores higher on overall composite score while Astro may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback