Skip to content

Astro vs WP-Statistics

Based on 59 and 1 real audits

View Astro details | View WP-Statistics details
MetricAstroWP-StatisticsWinner
Performance5585WP-Statistics
Accessibility9292Tie
Best Practices91100WP-Statistics
SEO95100WP-Statistics
Security6887WP-Statistics
TTFB304ms61msWP-Statistics
Composite7788WP-Statistics
Performance
Astro
55
WP-Statistics
85
Accessibility
Astro
92
WP-Statistics
92
Security
Astro
68
WP-Statistics
87
SEO
Astro
95
WP-Statistics
100
Composite
Astro
77
WP-Statistics
88

WP-Statistics outperforms Astro in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (88 vs 77). Astro leads in no categories.

When to choose Astro

Astro doesn't clearly lead WP-Statistics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose WP-Statistics

Choose WP-Statistics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 59 audited Astro sites and 1 audited WP-Statistics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Astro or WP-Statistics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, WP-Statistics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (85 vs 55 on average).
Which has better security, Astro or WP-Statistics?
WP-Statistics sites score higher on security analysis (87 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Astro or WP-Statistics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Astro (92 vs 92). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Astro or WP-Statistics?
WP-Statistics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 95 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Astro or WP-Statistics?
WP-Statistics sites show lower Time to First Byte (61 ms vs 304 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Astro or WP-Statistics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. WP-Statistics scores higher on overall composite score while Astro may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback