| Metric | Astro | Yandex.Direct | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 56 | 65 | Yandex.Direct |
| Accessibility | 92 | 69 | Astro |
| Best Practices | 91 | 88 | Astro |
| SEO | 95 | 91 | Astro |
| Security | 69 | 76 | Yandex.Direct |
| TTFB | 295ms | 186ms | Yandex.Direct |
| Composite | 77 | 80 | Yandex.Direct |
Yandex.Direct outperforms Astro in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 77). Astro leads in accessibility, best practices, SEO.
Choose Astro when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yandex.Direct when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 62 audited Astro sites and 2 audited Yandex.Direct sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback