Skip to content

AT Internet Analyzer vs Dynatrace RUM

Based on 4 and 1 real audits

View AT Internet Analyzer details | View Dynatrace RUM details
MetricAT Internet AnalyzerDynatrace RUMWinner
Performance5147AT Internet Analyzer
Accessibility9197Dynatrace RUM
Best Practices9581AT Internet Analyzer
SEO94100Dynatrace RUM
Security6360AT Internet Analyzer
TTFB246ms113msDynatrace RUM
Composite7572AT Internet Analyzer
Performance
AT Internet Analyzer
51
Dynatrace RUM
47
Accessibility
AT Internet Analyzer
91
Dynatrace RUM
97
Security
AT Internet Analyzer
63
Dynatrace RUM
60
SEO
AT Internet Analyzer
94
Dynatrace RUM
100
Composite
AT Internet Analyzer
75
Dynatrace RUM
72

AT Internet Analyzer outperforms Dynatrace RUM in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Dynatrace RUM leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, AT Internet Analyzer or Dynatrace RUM?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AT Internet Analyzer sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (51 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, AT Internet Analyzer or Dynatrace RUM?
AT Internet Analyzer sites score higher on security analysis (63 vs 60 on average).
Should I choose AT Internet Analyzer or Dynatrace RUM for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AT Internet Analyzer scores higher on performance while AT Internet Analyzer may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback