Skip to content

AT Internet Analyzer vs HSTS

Based on 9 and 2556 real audits

View AT Internet Analyzer details | View HSTS details
MetricAT Internet AnalyzerHSTSWinner
Performance5249AT Internet Analyzer
Accessibility9089AT Internet Analyzer
Best Practices9588AT Internet Analyzer
SEO9491AT Internet Analyzer
Security6570HSTS
TTFB235ms364msAT Internet Analyzer
Composite7675AT Internet Analyzer
Performance
AT Internet Analyzer
52
HSTS
49
Accessibility
AT Internet Analyzer
90
HSTS
89
Security
AT Internet Analyzer
65
HSTS
70
SEO
AT Internet Analyzer
94
HSTS
91
Composite
AT Internet Analyzer
76
HSTS
75

AT Internet Analyzer outperforms HSTS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). HSTS leads in security.

When to choose AT Internet Analyzer

Choose AT Internet Analyzer when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 9 audited AT Internet Analyzer sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AT Internet Analyzer or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AT Internet Analyzer sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, AT Internet Analyzer or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AT Internet Analyzer or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AT Internet Analyzer (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AT Internet Analyzer or HSTS?
AT Internet Analyzer sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AT Internet Analyzer or HSTS?
AT Internet Analyzer sites show lower Time to First Byte (235 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AT Internet Analyzer or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AT Internet Analyzer scores higher on overall composite score while AT Internet Analyzer may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback