Skip to content

AT Internet Analyzer vs TrackJs

Based on 1 and 1 real audits

View AT Internet Analyzer details | View TrackJs details
MetricAT Internet AnalyzerTrackJsWinner
Performance3925AT Internet Analyzer
Accessibility88100TrackJs
Best Practices10077AT Internet Analyzer
SEO9292Tie
Security6477TrackJs
TTFB65ms132msAT Internet Analyzer
Composite7673AT Internet Analyzer
Performance
AT Internet Analyzer
39
TrackJs
25
Accessibility
AT Internet Analyzer
88
TrackJs
100
Security
AT Internet Analyzer
64
TrackJs
77
SEO
AT Internet Analyzer
92
TrackJs
92
Composite
AT Internet Analyzer
76
TrackJs
73

AT Internet Analyzer outperforms TrackJs in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). TrackJs leads in accessibility, security.

FAQ

Which is faster, AT Internet Analyzer or TrackJs?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AT Internet Analyzer sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, AT Internet Analyzer or TrackJs?
TrackJs sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 64 on average).
Should I choose AT Internet Analyzer or TrackJs for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AT Internet Analyzer scores higher on performance while AT Internet Analyzer may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback