| Metric | Attentive | Findify | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 26 | 28 | Findify |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Attentive |
| Best Practices | 81 | 81 | Tie |
| SEO | 93 | 100 | Findify |
| Security | 75 | 83 | Findify |
| TTFB | 327ms | 450ms | Attentive |
| Composite | 76 | 80 | Findify |
Findify outperforms Attentive in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 76). Attentive leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Attentive when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Findify when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 26 audited Attentive sites and 1 audited Findify sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback