Based on 8 and 284 real audits
| Metric | Autoptimize | Yoast SEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 45 | Autoptimize |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | Yoast SEO |
| Best Practices | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| SEO | 95 | 90 | Autoptimize |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Yoast SEO |
| TTFB | 217ms | 388ms | Autoptimize |
| Composite | 76 | 75 | Autoptimize |
Autoptimize outperforms Yoast SEO in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). Yoast SEO leads in accessibility, security.
Choose Autoptimize when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yoast SEO when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 8 audited Autoptimize sites and 284 audited Yoast SEO sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback