| Metric | Aweber | Webpack | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 38 | Aweber |
| Accessibility | 90 | 89 | Aweber |
| Best Practices | 84 | 87 | Webpack |
| SEO | 94 | 92 | Aweber |
| Security | 60 | 66 | Webpack |
| TTFB | 311ms | 305ms | Webpack |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Aweber and Webpack are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Aweber has a composite score of 73 while Webpack scores 73.
Choose Aweber when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Webpack when your primary concern is security and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited Aweber sites and 956 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback