Skip to content

AWIN vs Shogun Frontend

Based on 13 and 1 real audits

View AWIN details | View Shogun Frontend details
MetricAWINShogun FrontendWinner
Performance3626AWIN
Accessibility8690Shogun Frontend
Best Practices8677AWIN
SEO8492Shogun Frontend
Security6673Shogun Frontend
TTFB239ms108msShogun Frontend
Composite7372AWIN
Performance
AWIN
36
Shogun Frontend
26
Accessibility
AWIN
86
Shogun Frontend
90
Security
AWIN
66
Shogun Frontend
73
SEO
AWIN
84
Shogun Frontend
92
Composite
AWIN
73
Shogun Frontend
72

Shogun Frontend outperforms AWIN in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). AWIN leads in performance, best practices, composite score.

When to choose AWIN

Choose AWIN when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Shogun Frontend

Choose Shogun Frontend when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 13 audited AWIN sites and 1 audited Shogun Frontend sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AWIN or Shogun Frontend?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AWIN sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 26 on average).
Which has better security, AWIN or Shogun Frontend?
Shogun Frontend sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AWIN or Shogun Frontend?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Shogun Frontend (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AWIN or Shogun Frontend?
Shogun Frontend sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AWIN or Shogun Frontend?
Shogun Frontend sites show lower Time to First Byte (108 ms vs 239 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AWIN or Shogun Frontend for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AWIN scores higher on overall composite score while AWIN may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback