Skip to content

AWS CloudFront vs ClickGUARD

Based on 395 and 1 real audits

View AWS CloudFront details | View ClickGUARD details
MetricAWS CloudFrontClickGUARDWinner
Performance3925AWS CloudFront
Accessibility8984AWS CloudFront
Best Practices8773AWS CloudFront
SEO9192ClickGUARD
Security6579ClickGUARD
TTFB233ms129msClickGUARD
Composite7277ClickGUARD
Performance
AWS CloudFront
39
ClickGUARD
25
Accessibility
AWS CloudFront
89
ClickGUARD
84
Security
AWS CloudFront
65
ClickGUARD
79
SEO
AWS CloudFront
91
ClickGUARD
92
Composite
AWS CloudFront
72
ClickGUARD
77

ClickGUARD outperforms AWS CloudFront in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 72). AWS CloudFront leads in performance, accessibility, best practices.

When to choose AWS CloudFront

Choose AWS CloudFront when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose ClickGUARD

Choose ClickGUARD when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 395 audited AWS CloudFront sites and 1 audited ClickGUARD sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AWS CloudFront or ClickGUARD?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AWS CloudFront sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, AWS CloudFront or ClickGUARD?
ClickGUARD sites score higher on security analysis (79 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AWS CloudFront or ClickGUARD?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AWS CloudFront (89 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AWS CloudFront or ClickGUARD?
ClickGUARD sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AWS CloudFront or ClickGUARD?
ClickGUARD sites show lower Time to First Byte (129 ms vs 233 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AWS CloudFront or ClickGUARD for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AWS CloudFront scores higher on overall composite score while AWS CloudFront may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback