Based on 401 and 1 real audits
| Metric | AWS CloudFront | Kevel | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 41 | Kevel |
| Accessibility | 89 | 98 | Kevel |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | AWS CloudFront |
| SEO | 91 | 100 | Kevel |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 238ms | 110ms | Kevel |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | AWS CloudFront |
Kevel outperforms AWS CloudFront in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 72). AWS CloudFront leads in best practices, composite score.
Choose AWS CloudFront when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kevel when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 401 audited AWS CloudFront sites and 1 audited Kevel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback