Skip to content

AWS CloudFront vs Microsoft

Based on 414 and 2504 real audits

View AWS CloudFront details | View Microsoft details
MetricAWS CloudFrontMicrosoftWinner
Performance3940Microsoft
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8786AWS CloudFront
SEO9189AWS CloudFront
Security6667Microsoft
TTFB261ms330msAWS CloudFront
Composite7373Tie
Performance
AWS CloudFront
39
Microsoft
40
Accessibility
AWS CloudFront
89
Microsoft
89
Security
AWS CloudFront
66
Microsoft
67
SEO
AWS CloudFront
91
Microsoft
89
Composite
AWS CloudFront
73
Microsoft
73

AWS CloudFront outperforms Microsoft in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Microsoft leads in performance, security.

When to choose AWS CloudFront

Choose AWS CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 414 audited AWS CloudFront sites and 2504 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AWS CloudFront or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, AWS CloudFront or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AWS CloudFront or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AWS CloudFront (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AWS CloudFront or Microsoft?
AWS CloudFront sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AWS CloudFront or Microsoft?
AWS CloudFront sites show lower Time to First Byte (261 ms vs 330 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AWS CloudFront or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while AWS CloudFront may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback