| Metric | AWS | AWS CloudFront | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 39 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | AWS CloudFront |
| Best Practices | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 234ms | 232ms | AWS CloudFront |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
AWS CloudFront outperforms AWS in 2 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). AWS leads in no categories.
AWS doesn't clearly lead AWS CloudFront in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose AWS CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 414 audited AWS sites and 396 audited AWS CloudFront sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback