Based on 414 and 1890 real audits
| Metric | AWS | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 41 | Google Analytics |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | AWS |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | AWS |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 64 | AWS |
| TTFB | 234ms | 400ms | AWS |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Google Analytics |
AWS outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in performance, composite score.
Choose AWS when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 414 audited AWS sites and 1890 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback