Skip to content

AWS vs Google Charts

Based on 405 and 2 real audits

View AWS details | View Google Charts details
MetricAWSGoogle ChartsWinner
Performance3945Google Charts
Accessibility8882AWS
Best Practices8781AWS
SEO9184AWS
Security6563AWS
TTFB235ms217msGoogle Charts
Composite7271AWS
Performance
AWS
39
Google Charts
45
Accessibility
AWS
88
Google Charts
82
Security
AWS
65
Google Charts
63
SEO
AWS
91
Google Charts
84
Composite
AWS
72
Google Charts
71

AWS outperforms Google Charts in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Google Charts leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose AWS

Choose AWS when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Charts

Choose Google Charts when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 405 audited AWS sites and 2 audited Google Charts sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AWS or Google Charts?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Charts sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, AWS or Google Charts?
AWS sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AWS or Google Charts?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AWS (88 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AWS or Google Charts?
AWS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AWS or Google Charts?
Google Charts sites show lower Time to First Byte (217 ms vs 235 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AWS or Google Charts for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Charts scores higher on overall composite score while AWS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback