Skip to content

AWS vs Google Search Console

Based on 448 and 4391 real audits

View AWS details | View Google Search Console details
MetricAWSGoogle Search ConsoleWinner
Performance3947Google Search Console
Accessibility8988AWS
Best Practices8787Tie
SEO9191Tie
Security6769Google Search Console
TTFB262ms366msAWS
Composite7375Google Search Console
Performance
AWS
39
Google Search Console
47
Accessibility
AWS
89
Google Search Console
88
Security
AWS
67
Google Search Console
69
SEO
AWS
91
Google Search Console
91
Composite
AWS
73
Google Search Console
75

Google Search Console outperforms AWS in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). AWS leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose AWS

Choose AWS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Search Console

Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 448 audited AWS sites and 4391 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AWS or Google Search Console?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Search Console sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, AWS or Google Search Console?
Google Search Console sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AWS or Google Search Console?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AWS (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AWS or Google Search Console?
AWS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AWS or Google Search Console?
AWS sites show lower Time to First Byte (262 ms vs 366 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AWS or Google Search Console for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Search Console scores higher on overall composite score while AWS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback