Skip to content

AWS vs Kevel

Based on 420 and 1 real audits

View AWS details | View Kevel details
MetricAWSKevelWinner
Performance3941Kevel
Accessibility8898Kevel
Best Practices8785AWS
SEO91100Kevel
Security6666Tie
TTFB239ms110msKevel
Composite7271AWS
Performance
AWS
39
Kevel
41
Accessibility
AWS
88
Kevel
98
Security
AWS
66
Kevel
66
SEO
AWS
91
Kevel
100
Composite
AWS
72
Kevel
71

Kevel outperforms AWS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 72). AWS leads in best practices, composite score.

When to choose AWS

Choose AWS when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Kevel

Choose Kevel when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 420 audited AWS sites and 1 audited Kevel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AWS or Kevel?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Kevel sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, AWS or Kevel?
AWS sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AWS or Kevel?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Kevel (98 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AWS or Kevel?
Kevel sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AWS or Kevel?
Kevel sites show lower Time to First Byte (110 ms vs 239 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AWS or Kevel for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Kevel scores higher on overall composite score while AWS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback