| Metric | AWS | Lemon Squeezy | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 56 | Lemon Squeezy |
| Accessibility | 88 | 100 | Lemon Squeezy |
| Best Practices | 87 | 96 | Lemon Squeezy |
| SEO | 91 | 83 | AWS |
| Security | 66 | 59 | AWS |
| TTFB | 239ms | 242ms | AWS |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
AWS and Lemon Squeezy are closely matched, each leading in different categories. AWS has a composite score of 72 while Lemon Squeezy scores 72.
Choose AWS when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Lemon Squeezy when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 420 audited AWS sites and 1 audited Lemon Squeezy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback