Skip to content

AWS vs Lunio

Based on 414 and 4 real audits

View AWS details | View Lunio details
MetricAWSLunioWinner
Performance3941Lunio
Accessibility8899Lunio
Best Practices8786AWS
SEO9194Lunio
Security6569Lunio
TTFB234ms63msLunio
Composite7275Lunio
Performance
AWS
39
Lunio
41
Accessibility
AWS
88
Lunio
99
Security
AWS
65
Lunio
69
SEO
AWS
91
Lunio
94
Composite
AWS
72
Lunio
75

Lunio outperforms AWS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). AWS leads in best practices.

When to choose AWS

Choose AWS when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Lunio

Choose Lunio when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 414 audited AWS sites and 4 audited Lunio sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AWS or Lunio?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Lunio sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, AWS or Lunio?
Lunio sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AWS or Lunio?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Lunio (99 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AWS or Lunio?
Lunio sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AWS or Lunio?
Lunio sites show lower Time to First Byte (63 ms vs 234 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AWS or Lunio for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Lunio scores higher on overall composite score while AWS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback