Skip to content

AWS vs Microsoft

Based on 414 and 2412 real audits

View AWS details | View Microsoft details
MetricAWSMicrosoftWinner
Performance3939Tie
Accessibility8889Microsoft
Best Practices8786AWS
SEO9189AWS
Security6566Microsoft
TTFB234ms329msAWS
Composite7272Tie
Performance
AWS
39
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
AWS
88
Microsoft
89
Security
AWS
65
Microsoft
66
SEO
AWS
91
Microsoft
89
Composite
AWS
72
Microsoft
72

AWS outperforms Microsoft in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Microsoft leads in accessibility, security.

When to choose AWS

Choose AWS when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 414 audited AWS sites and 2412 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AWS or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AWS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, AWS or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AWS or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AWS or Microsoft?
AWS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AWS or Microsoft?
AWS sites show lower Time to First Byte (234 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AWS or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AWS scores higher on overall composite score while AWS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback