Skip to content

AWS vs Split

Based on 420 and 1 real audits

View AWS details | View Split details
MetricAWSSplitWinner
Performance3928AWS
Accessibility8893Split
Best Practices8773AWS
SEO91100Split
Security6677Split
TTFB239ms108msSplit
Composite7274Split
Performance
AWS
39
Split
28
Accessibility
AWS
88
Split
93
Security
AWS
66
Split
77
SEO
AWS
91
Split
100
Composite
AWS
72
Split
74

Split outperforms AWS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). AWS leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose AWS

Choose AWS when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Split

Choose Split when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 420 audited AWS sites and 1 audited Split sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AWS or Split?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AWS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, AWS or Split?
Split sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AWS or Split?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Split (93 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AWS or Split?
Split sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AWS or Split?
Split sites show lower Time to First Byte (108 ms vs 239 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AWS or Split for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AWS scores higher on overall composite score while AWS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback