| Metric | Axios | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 36 | Axios |
| Accessibility | 85 | 88 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 86 | 84 | Axios |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Axios |
| Security | 67 | 65 | Axios |
| TTFB | 361ms | 385ms | Axios |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Axios outperforms core-js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). core-js leads in accessibility.
Choose Axios when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 29 audited Axios sites and 1637 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback