| Metric | Axios | HSTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 49 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 85 | 89 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 86 | 88 | HSTS |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Axios |
| Security | 66 | 70 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 368ms | 364ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 73 | 75 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Axios in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Axios leads in SEO.
Choose Axios when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 28 audited Axios sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback