| Metric | Axios | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 45 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 85 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 368ms | 365ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Axios in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Axios leads in no categories.
Axios doesn't clearly lead Open Graph in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 28 audited Axios sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback