| Metric | Azure CDN | Lithium | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 24 | Azure CDN |
| Accessibility | 93 | 99 | Lithium |
| Best Practices | 86 | 69 | Azure CDN |
| SEO | 90 | 100 | Lithium |
| Security | 70 | 80 | Lithium |
| TTFB | 367ms | 1922ms | Azure CDN |
| Composite | 75 | 78 | Lithium |
Lithium outperforms Azure CDN in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). Azure CDN leads in performance, best practices, TTFB.
Choose Azure CDN when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Lithium when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 38 audited Azure CDN sites and 1 audited Lithium sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback