| Metric | Azure DNS | HSTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 49 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 92 | 89 | Azure DNS |
| Best Practices | 84 | 88 | HSTS |
| SEO | 89 | 91 | HSTS |
| Security | 66 | 70 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 276ms | 364ms | Azure DNS |
| Composite | 72 | 75 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Azure DNS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Azure DNS leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Azure DNS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 93 audited Azure DNS sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback