| Metric | Azure DNS | Zeotap | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 26 | Azure DNS |
| Accessibility | 92 | 94 | Zeotap |
| Best Practices | 84 | 77 | Azure DNS |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Zeotap |
| Security | 66 | 58 | Azure DNS |
| TTFB | 277ms | 127ms | Zeotap |
| Composite | 72 | 69 | Azure DNS |
Azure DNS outperforms Zeotap in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 69). Zeotap leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Azure DNS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Zeotap when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 95 audited Azure DNS sites and 1 audited Zeotap sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback