Based on 16 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Azure Edge Network | Fast Simon | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 21 | Azure Edge Network |
| Accessibility | 89 | 92 | Fast Simon |
| Best Practices | 84 | 77 | Azure Edge Network |
| SEO | 87 | 85 | Azure Edge Network |
| Security | 69 | 71 | Fast Simon |
| TTFB | 638ms | 180ms | Fast Simon |
| Composite | 75 | 72 | Azure Edge Network |
Azure Edge Network outperforms Fast Simon in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Fast Simon leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.
Choose Azure Edge Network when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Fast Simon when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 16 audited Azure Edge Network sites and 1 audited Fast Simon sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback