Based on 32 and 2487 real audits
| Metric | Azure Front Door | HSTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 48 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 93 | 89 | Azure Front Door |
| Best Practices | 86 | 88 | HSTS |
| SEO | 89 | 91 | HSTS |
| Security | 68 | 69 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 306ms | 354ms | Azure Front Door |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Azure Front Door in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Azure Front Door leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Azure Front Door when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 32 audited Azure Front Door sites and 2487 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback