Based on 37 and 2530 real audits
| Metric | Azure Front Door | Microsoft | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 40 | Azure Front Door |
| Accessibility | 93 | 89 | Azure Front Door |
| Best Practices | 87 | 86 | Azure Front Door |
| SEO | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Security | 70 | 67 | Azure Front Door |
| TTFB | 325ms | 333ms | Azure Front Door |
| Composite | 75 | 73 | Azure Front Door |
Azure Front Door outperforms Microsoft in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Microsoft leads in no categories.
Choose Azure Front Door when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Microsoft doesn't clearly lead Azure Front Door in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 37 audited Azure Front Door sites and 2530 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback