Based on 33 and 2421 real audits
| Metric | Azure Front Door | Microsoft | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 39 | Azure Front Door |
| Accessibility | 93 | 89 | Azure Front Door |
| Best Practices | 85 | 86 | Microsoft |
| SEO | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Security | 69 | 66 | Azure Front Door |
| TTFB | 341ms | 329ms | Microsoft |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | Azure Front Door |
Azure Front Door outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Microsoft leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose Azure Front Door when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 33 audited Azure Front Door sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback