| Metric | Azure | Azure CDN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 45 | Azure CDN |
| Accessibility | 92 | 93 | Azure CDN |
| Best Practices | 82 | 85 | Azure CDN |
| SEO | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 68 | Azure CDN |
| TTFB | 316ms | 311ms | Azure CDN |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Azure CDN |
Azure CDN outperforms Azure in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Azure leads in no categories.
Azure doesn't clearly lead Azure CDN in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Azure CDN when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 78 audited Azure sites and 31 audited Azure CDN sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback