Based on 78 and 32 real audits
| Metric | Azure | Azure Front Door | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 46 | Azure Front Door |
| Accessibility | 92 | 93 | Azure Front Door |
| Best Practices | 82 | 86 | Azure Front Door |
| SEO | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 68 | Azure Front Door |
| TTFB | 316ms | 306ms | Azure Front Door |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Azure Front Door |
Azure Front Door outperforms Azure in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Azure leads in no categories.
Azure doesn't clearly lead Azure Front Door in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Azure Front Door when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 78 audited Azure sites and 32 audited Azure Front Door sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback