Based on 80 and 18 real audits
| Metric | Azure | Microsoft Application Insights | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 36 | Azure |
| Accessibility | 92 | 88 | Azure |
| Best Practices | 82 | 78 | Azure |
| SEO | 89 | 88 | Azure |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Azure |
| TTFB | 337ms | 454ms | Azure |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Microsoft Application Insights |
Azure outperforms Microsoft Application Insights in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Microsoft Application Insights leads in composite score.
Choose Azure when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Microsoft Application Insights doesn't clearly lead Azure in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 80 audited Azure sites and 18 audited Microsoft Application Insights sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback