| Metric | Babel | Fast Simon | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 21 | Babel |
| Accessibility | 85 | 92 | Fast Simon |
| Best Practices | 83 | 77 | Babel |
| SEO | 88 | 85 | Babel |
| Security | 66 | 71 | Fast Simon |
| TTFB | 382ms | 180ms | Fast Simon |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Babel and Fast Simon are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Babel has a composite score of 72 while Fast Simon scores 72.
Choose Babel when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Fast Simon when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 116 audited Babel sites and 1 audited Fast Simon sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback