Based on 102 and 1905 real audits
| Metric | Babel | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 41 | Google Analytics |
| Accessibility | 84 | 87 | Google Analytics |
| Best Practices | 82 | 85 | Google Analytics |
| SEO | 88 | 91 | Google Analytics |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 407ms | 401ms | Google Analytics |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | Google Analytics |
Google Analytics outperforms Babel in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Babel leads in no categories.
Babel doesn't clearly lead Google Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 102 audited Babel sites and 1905 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback