Skip to content

Babel vs Strikingly

Based on 100 and 1 real audits

View Babel details | View Strikingly details
MetricBabelStrikinglyWinner
Performance3317Babel
Accessibility8488Strikingly
Best Practices8269Babel
SEO88100Strikingly
Security6455Babel
TTFB390ms668msBabel
Composite7168Babel
Performance
Babel
33
Strikingly
17
Accessibility
Babel
84
Strikingly
88
Security
Babel
64
Strikingly
55
SEO
Babel
88
Strikingly
100
Composite
Babel
71
Strikingly
68

Babel outperforms Strikingly in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 68). Strikingly leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose Babel

Choose Babel when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Strikingly

Choose Strikingly when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 100 audited Babel sites and 1 audited Strikingly sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Babel or Strikingly?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Babel sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (33 vs 17 on average).
Which has better security, Babel or Strikingly?
Babel sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 55 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Babel or Strikingly?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Strikingly (88 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Babel or Strikingly?
Strikingly sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Babel or Strikingly?
Babel sites show lower Time to First Byte (390 ms vs 668 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Babel or Strikingly for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Babel scores higher on overall composite score while Babel may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback