Based on 21 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Baidu Analytics (百度统计) | CNZZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 9 | Baidu Analytics (百度统计) |
| Accessibility | 71 | 64 | Baidu Analytics (百度统计) |
| Best Practices | 78 | 73 | Baidu Analytics (百度统计) |
| SEO | 85 | 92 | CNZZ |
| Security | 60 | 57 | Baidu Analytics (百度统计) |
| TTFB | 875ms | 574ms | CNZZ |
| Composite | 68 | 66 | Baidu Analytics (百度统计) |
Baidu Analytics (百度统计) outperforms CNZZ in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (68 vs 66). CNZZ leads in SEO, TTFB.
Choose Baidu Analytics (百度统计) when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose CNZZ when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 21 audited Baidu Analytics (百度统计) sites and 1 audited CNZZ sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback