| Metric | Batch | Bootstrap | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 46 | Bootstrap |
| Accessibility | 86 | 87 | Bootstrap |
| Best Practices | 96 | 87 | Batch |
| SEO | 94 | 90 | Batch |
| Security | 63 | 65 | Bootstrap |
| TTFB | 426ms | 434ms | Batch |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Bootstrap |
Bootstrap outperforms Batch in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Batch leads in best practices, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Batch when your primary concern is best practices and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Bootstrap when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 8 audited Batch sites and 885 audited Bootstrap sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback