| Metric | Beae | Revy | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 28 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 95 | 95 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 73 | 73 | Tie |
| SEO | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 80 | 80 | Tie |
| TTFB | 744ms | 744ms | Tie |
| Composite | 79 | 79 | Tie |
Beae and Revy are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Beae has a composite score of 79 while Revy scores 79.
Beae doesn't clearly lead Revy in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Revy doesn't clearly lead Beae in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Beae sites and 2 audited Revy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback