Based on 2 and 1779 real audits
| Metric | Beehiiv RSS feed | Google Workspace | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 45 | Google Workspace |
| Accessibility | 97 | 88 | Beehiiv RSS feed |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | Google Workspace |
| SEO | 96 | 90 | Beehiiv RSS feed |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 46ms | 282ms | Beehiiv RSS feed |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Beehiiv RSS feed outperforms Google Workspace in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Google Workspace leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Beehiiv RSS feed when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Beehiiv RSS feed sites and 1779 audited Google Workspace sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback