Based on 3 and 39 real audits
| Metric | Beusable | Naver Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 25 | 36 | Naver Analytics |
| Accessibility | 76 | 89 | Naver Analytics |
| Best Practices | 66 | 85 | Naver Analytics |
| SEO | 97 | 93 | Beusable |
| Security | 57 | 65 | Naver Analytics |
| TTFB | 932ms | 454ms | Naver Analytics |
| Composite | 66 | 72 | Naver Analytics |
Naver Analytics outperforms Beusable in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 66). Beusable leads in SEO.
Choose Beusable when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Naver Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Beusable sites and 39 audited Naver Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback