Skip to content

Bidmatic vs DoubleClick Floodlight

Based on 24 and 594 real audits

View Bidmatic details | View DoubleClick Floodlight details
MetricBidmaticDoubleClick FloodlightWinner
Performance3032DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8487DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices7381DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9191Tie
Security6464Tie
TTFB373ms340msDoubleClick Floodlight
Composite7072DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
Bidmatic
30
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Accessibility
Bidmatic
84
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Security
Bidmatic
64
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
SEO
Bidmatic
91
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Composite
Bidmatic
70
DoubleClick Floodlight
72

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Bidmatic in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Bidmatic leads in no categories.

When to choose Bidmatic

Bidmatic doesn't clearly lead DoubleClick Floodlight in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 24 audited Bidmatic sites and 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Bidmatic or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Bidmatic or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Bidmatic sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Bidmatic or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Bidmatic or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Bidmatic sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Bidmatic or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites show lower Time to First Byte (340 ms vs 373 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Bidmatic or DoubleClick Floodlight for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while Bidmatic may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback