| Metric | Bidmatic | Unruly | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 30 | 41 | Unruly |
| Accessibility | 84 | 86 | Unruly |
| Best Practices | 73 | 81 | Unruly |
| SEO | 91 | 100 | Unruly |
| Security | 64 | 62 | Bidmatic |
| TTFB | 373ms | 443ms | Bidmatic |
| Composite | 70 | 72 | Unruly |
Unruly outperforms Bidmatic in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Bidmatic leads in security, TTFB.
Choose Bidmatic when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Unruly when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 24 audited Bidmatic sites and 1 audited Unruly sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback