Based on 2 and 1 real audits
| Metric | BigCommerce | Makeswift | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 29 | 22 | BigCommerce |
| Accessibility | 87 | 93 | Makeswift |
| Best Practices | 86 | 96 | Makeswift |
| SEO | 73 | 61 | BigCommerce |
| Security | 74 | 71 | BigCommerce |
| TTFB | 836ms | 695ms | Makeswift |
| Composite | 76 | 76 | Tie |
BigCommerce and Makeswift are closely matched, each leading in different categories. BigCommerce has a composite score of 76 while Makeswift scores 76.
Choose BigCommerce when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Makeswift when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited BigCommerce sites and 1 audited Makeswift sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback