Based on 3 and 139 real audits
| Metric | Blazor | Microsoft ASP.NET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 41 | Blazor |
| Accessibility | 78 | 87 | Microsoft ASP.NET |
| Best Practices | 87 | 84 | Blazor |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Blazor |
| Security | 75 | 66 | Blazor |
| TTFB | 159ms | 491ms | Blazor |
| Composite | 78 | 73 | Blazor |
Blazor outperforms Microsoft ASP.NET in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Microsoft ASP.NET leads in accessibility.
Choose Blazor when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Microsoft ASP.NET when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Blazor sites and 139 audited Microsoft ASP.NET sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback