Skip to content

Blogger vs Font Awesome

Based on 4 and 641 real audits

View Blogger details | View Font Awesome details
MetricBloggerFont AwesomeWinner
Performance5046Blogger
Accessibility7686Font Awesome
Best Practices8688Font Awesome
SEO7991Font Awesome
Security7367Blogger
TTFB542ms463msFont Awesome
Composite7774Blogger
Performance
Blogger
50
Font Awesome
46
Accessibility
Blogger
76
Font Awesome
86
Security
Blogger
73
Font Awesome
67
SEO
Blogger
79
Font Awesome
91
Composite
Blogger
77
Font Awesome
74

Font Awesome outperforms Blogger in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 77). Blogger leads in performance, security, composite score.

When to choose Blogger

Choose Blogger when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4 audited Blogger sites and 641 audited Font Awesome sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Blogger or Font Awesome?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Blogger sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 46 on average).
Which has better security, Blogger or Font Awesome?
Blogger sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Blogger or Font Awesome?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Font Awesome (86 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Blogger or Font Awesome?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 79 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Blogger or Font Awesome?
Font Awesome sites show lower Time to First Byte (463 ms vs 542 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Blogger or Font Awesome for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Blogger scores higher on overall composite score while Blogger may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback