Based on 5 and 1857 real audits
| Metric | Blue Triangle | jQuery | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 45 | jQuery |
| Accessibility | 95 | 86 | Blue Triangle |
| Best Practices | 79 | 87 | jQuery |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 63 | 65 | jQuery |
| TTFB | 189ms | 438ms | Blue Triangle |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | jQuery |
jQuery outperforms Blue Triangle in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Blue Triangle leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Blue Triangle when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose jQuery when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Blue Triangle sites and 1857 audited jQuery sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback