Skip to content

Blue vs Criteo

Based on 1 and 110 real audits

View Blue details | View Criteo details
MetricBlueCriteoWinner
Performance2629Criteo
Accessibility7184Criteo
Best Practices7776Blue
SEO8590Criteo
Security6064Criteo
TTFB336ms299msCriteo
Composite6870Criteo
Performance
Blue
26
Criteo
29
Accessibility
Blue
71
Criteo
84
Security
Blue
60
Criteo
64
SEO
Blue
85
Criteo
90
Composite
Blue
68
Criteo
70

Criteo outperforms Blue in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 68). Blue leads in best practices.

When to choose Blue

Choose Blue when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Criteo

Choose Criteo when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Blue sites and 110 audited Criteo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Blue or Criteo?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Criteo sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (29 vs 26 on average).
Which has better security, Blue or Criteo?
Criteo sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Blue or Criteo?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Criteo (84 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Blue or Criteo?
Criteo sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Blue or Criteo?
Criteo sites show lower Time to First Byte (299 ms vs 336 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Blue or Criteo for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Criteo scores higher on overall composite score while Blue may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback